← All channels

Spectator TV

@SpectatorTV on YouTube

Updated: 1mo ago

Get comments

Recent comments

Gove is totally wrong. Parties of all stripes have ALWAYS punished those people that haven't voted for them. Back in the day, Liebour wouldn't do shit for teachers and the professions because they were all Tories. Now these public sector people are Liebour's core supporters with the government constantly bending over backwards for them. Gove is either being disingenuous of naive if he is arguing otherwise.

Zionism is a political ideology. Labour government will not hold a public inquiry into the influence of pro-Israel groups in British politics, The house of commons Speaker Lindsay Hoyle whos father is a founding member Labour Friends of Israel has personally intervened to block the release of emails he sent to Israeli politicians. Mandelson, Epstien, Mandelson , Blair, Lammy, Priti Patel all had secret meetings with Isreal. It is all connected, thats why they dont want an investigation. Benjamin Netanyahu is a wanted war criminal. All roads lead to Isreal.

The reason the war on drugs has failed is because there is no war. I live in an affluent area of the country and recently a young has moved into the house next of mine. He smokes weed and sells it. He’s been beaten black and blue by a group of local lads and he now smokes the weed away from the houses, I’ve reported him over 20 times to the police and crime stoppers, never seen a single police officer attend the property. Yet if I posted something about immigrants on X my house would be stormed by armed officers. The police are doing nothing about casual weed use round the country. It’s rotting our communities from the inside out.

Here's a theory to consider: Every crime is an income stream for a criminal. And a criminal is a kind of businessman, more than he is a byproduct of there being acts that are crimes. So a criminal is going to do everything possible to maximize profits, since that's the be-all and end-all of good business values. Do a little sum, using those trite facts as inputs. You create the new crime of using and selling narcotics, the unscrupulous businessmen see a little partial monopoly they can exploit, they set up shop, they seek out suppliers and customers, and they work hard to build this business (including by unscrupulous ways, because they're the unscrupulous variety of businessman). So what happens if you remove the crime aspect from the above? Keep it simple. Focus on just the effect of eliminating the crime. I think what happens is that the business case collapses or weakens? Yes, you still have a drugs problem. If you jumped the gun with this at the request to consider just the effect on the drug dealer of maintaining or repealing just the criminal law part of the legislation, please just rewind a tiny bit and consider just this matter. I think it's part of which all the fighting animals in this pit we're creating might agree, and since it's going to be difficult to find civilized common ground in the midst of the general belligerence of the current crop of know-it-alls and their is-isn't-is-isn't debates it's important to establish as much of that as is possible. I posit that (regardless of what you prejudge the best way to deal with the narcotics problem is) that if you use the criminal law approach it creates drug dealers of the kind willing to break any other law. So your drug dealer will be willing to trade some drugs for an addict's little daughter, for instance. It puts the problem in the control of the kind of people who use this to create yet more problems. OK, now I'll just say that there are almost always more than two choices of just about anything. And it seems to me that "both sides" (there are two sides, because that's how we have to vote - like stupid animals in a fighting pit - for one side or the other) are wrong. I propose a third alternative. Nationalize. Sell narcotics in a way that _minimizes_ profits. (This eliminates liberalization as a good way of dealing with the problem). Sell at cost price plus levies to cover side effects. So you'd have a drug abuser education levy to pay for the cost of courses to ensure _informed_ consent on the part of those who choose to harm themselves this way. You'd also have a rehabilitation levy to cover the cost of trying to put Humpty together again. Oh, and for some drugs, you'd have to require contraception - vasectomy for men, IUD for women, maybe. It's irresponsible to give birth to little babies while under the effects of a drug habit. A hard times insurance levy would also be a good idea. This is for the times when a mother is out of money and desperate enough for drugs that she might to something along the lines of "selling" her children. Rather ensure that there are funds out of which you can extend a loan you don't enforce too harshly. I didn't say I have a way to fix the problem. Nobody has. There are just two other popular ways of sweeping the problem under the rug - of being able to go to the voters and say, "See? I _did something_ about this". What you gain to some extent is a capacity to exercise control of the phenomenon - in the little details, examples of which appear above. Some control is what I'd guess is the best you can do, short of just crushing people into submission. And then you might as well just set up a caliphate and go the whole hog. As far as the real world prospects of that goes, I'd point out that at least while Assad was able to run drug labs, the whole Middle East had a big drug problem that probably still exists. And you'll find that there's an alcoholism problem in Pakistan, too. Full success in prohibition is automa

"The master of our fate and the captain of our soul." How utterly ridiculous: All flesh is as grass, and all the glory of man as the flower of the grass. The grass withereth and the flower thereof falleth away: But the word of the Lord endureth forever. William Ernest Henley, the man who wrote Invictus (the poem from which it is quoted) went on to die of tuberculosis following a fall from a train carriage. The idea that he was the master of his fate is deserving of nothing but ridicule.

Katie Lam's reasons why Nigel Farage would be a bad prime minister was that the necessary work will be boring, and Nigel doesn't do boring. That's the best she's got? Also, she said that the Tories made huge errors in government and that's why they should be given another chance - we won't make them again but Reform will. These are VERY weak arguments. The reality is that Reform & the Tories agree, certainly at a strategic level, on just about everything, so which Party you vote for is gut feel rather than policy differences.

We have taught our young people to have no respect. no connection to their own cultural or their own society , so many people perceive , they are being ripped off by the government , by the politicians.. Britain has become one of the most expensive countries to live in... the prices of so many things Keeps going up... making our society less cohesive...so why would they care about stealing from a supermarket..

I work at an International airport and witnessed a small yet shocking amount of immigration courtesy of Johnson. Every day flights would arrive with huge families consisting of a Mother (usually the care worker), a husband, anywhere between 4 to 9(!!!!) children and in some cases elderly parents. Speaking to some of them they had borrowed money to pay someone to arrange a ‘care worker’ Visa from India. The care home they were going to was invariably owned by an Indian owned company, the worker would be allowed 3 months of accommodation and then they were on their own. Most spoke no English. I often wonder where they all went, even now. Thousands upon thousands. Everyone I worked with was stunned. The kids needed school, the elderly parents would need care ironically and certainly health care. Bearing in mind it’s unlikely any of these people will pay any tax the costs must be insane. Absolutely unsustainable. Johnson should be jailed.

Enjoyed listening to this podcast! One thing I’ve been hung up about since July ‘24, is that Labour, having been in opposition for 14 years, had NOTHING PLANNED AT ALL! It was like a very heavy freight train behind a tiny locomotive on an incline! Barely moving at all, and touching its brakes 14 or 15 times(U-turns). That’s a very poor party to vote for at an election!

The class that these people belong to bear the most privilege and thus the most responsibility.journos have been happy to slate criticize and undermine police, teachers and social workers in order to earn a crust while failing repeatedly to properly hold politicians and their inner circles to account. The final straw was Covid and then everyone from Neil Ferguson to Matt Hancock to the PM himself breaking the rules and often the law. Why on earth should anyone behave well when their so called leaders don’t?! The social contract between people and most institutions, whether it is Tesco or your kids school, has really crumbled. People who do wrong get away with it, people who stick to the rules suffer. Who’s the mug?

Interesting question from the Editor: 'what went wrong with ...'. is the reason I will now vote Reform. I have much respect for Ms Lam (she likes poetry!) and I hope she does well but like many others I could no longer consider voting for the Conservative Party - their 14 years in office, post Labour, were a disgrace to the name 'conservative'. Ms Lam's comment suggesting that the CP has learnt from its mistakes is positive but surely impractical with the current batch of MPs who seem to be more LibDem/Green in their views - not, of course, that they will necessarily be re-elected. Great discussion.

Alcohol kills far more people than any other substance illegal or legal and talk about Cannabis coursing health issues then what does tobacco with it 7000+ chemicals VS cannabis with it 3 chemicals; Nitrogen, Phosphorus, and Potassium, that are flushed from the plant that is close if not 100% clean chemically because they don't want chemicals making it into the final cannabis product affecting smell and flavour. If cannabis is so bad for you then tell me how is Tommy Chong at 87 and Cheech Marin at 79 still alive well and high all the time seems to have been so bad for them 💩 and here’s a list of a select few very special individuals who have used cannabis Bob Marley, Snoop Dogg, Willie Nelson, Rihanna, Dr. Dre, Miley Cyrus, The Beatles, Kurt Cobain, Jay-Z, Tyler, The Creator, A$AP Rocky, Kendrick Lamar, Redman, Lady Gaga, Johnny Depp, Barbra Streisand, Brad Pitt, Kristen Stewart, Emma Roberts, Sarah Silverman, Seth Rogen, Cardi B, Kirsten Dunst, Matthew McConaughey, Megan Fox, Ben Affleck, Olivia Wilde, Kate Moss, Russell Brand, Lily Allen, Noel Gallagher, Danny Dyer, Cara Delevingne, David Beckham, Monty Don, Sadiq Khan, Jade Jagger, Richard Branson, John Lennon, Ed Sheeran, Stormzy, Aitch, Zayn Malik, and Samantha Fox so clearly cannabis does not rob you of your senses and makes you lazy and/or overall less productive, Queen Elizabeth the 1st and William Shakespeare definitively the most creative mind of the 16th century and Alexander Dumas known for the Three Musketeers another great writer, also Queen Victoria and her physician said marijuana is one of the most valuable medicines they possess, Hua Tuo created the first anaesthetic using wine and weed and Francis Crick was one of the most historic scientists of his time, some of the most famous historical figures used cannabis and they literally changed the entire world. Including its positive effects on the global economy, here’s the show of many benefits cannabis plant to start; 1. Pain Relief. 2. Anti-inflammatory Effects. 3. Reduction of Anxiety and Stress. 4. Improved Sleep. 5. Neuroprotective Properties and 6. Appetite Stimulation. 7. Anti-Nausea and Vomiting and 8. Muscle Relaxation. 9. Epilepsy and Seizure Control. 10. Mood Stabilization and Anti Depressive effects. 11. Cancer Treatment Support. 12. Glaucoma Treatment. 13. Skin Health. 14. Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) symptom management. 15. Addiction Treatment and Heart Health. 17. Antioxidant and Antibacterial Properties. 18. Multiple Sclerosis (MS) Relief. 19. Migraines and Headaches. 20. Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) 21. Anti-tumour properties. 22. Diabetes Management. 23. Crohn’s Disease and Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) Relief. 24. Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS) 25. Hair Follicular Regeneration. 26. Menstrual Pain Relief. 27. Anti-psychotic effects. 28. Bone Health and Healing. 29. Reduction of Chronic Inflammation. 30. Improved Mental Focus. And finally 31. Mood Enhancement. The main component of cannabis often blamed for mental health problems is THC; yet cannabis also contains cannabidiol (CBD) and other compounds which has neuroprotective properties; it’s worth noting that we all have an endocannabinoid system designed to receive cannabinoids, this plant interacts with our bodies, and few realize that the human body produces chemicals similar to THC known as endocannabinoids, found across all vertebrate species even if you’ve never used cannabis, if it triggers underlying mental health issues due to our natural internal body production these cannabis-like chemicals and molecules everyone across the entire globe 100% of people would experience mental health problems and we don’t, cannabis does not influence the person that you are; if you are still in control of your body you do not lose control of your actions and this is just reiterated hysteria on repeat.

8:06 Trevor half nails it here. Sure, small communities help ringfence public shame, meaning everyone knows everyone else's transgressions, and so you can never escape the glare of public opprobrium. But we had a shared, common set of morals in our cities and large towns before this new age of selfishness and tribalism, which kept most everyone in check. 70 years ago, people lived side by side with strangers in their hundreds of thousands, and in capitals like London, in their millions, with astonishingly low levels of petty and serious crime, by today's standards. So what has changed? Two things... academia and unrestricted immigration. Academia has infected society with layer upon layer of iconoclastic, tradition-wrecking, experimental ideas, leaving all western societies godless and unmoored from our traditions and our histories. And immigration has invited in a world of people who think tribally and clannishly - people for whom morality means nothing more than clan loyalty. These are the true twin reasons for the collapse in standards throughout the west. In both cases, I blame the progressives. Why not? They gave us Nazism and eugenics, so they clearly have an atrocious track record. We should stop listening to (non-STEM) 'experts', and go back to learning from wise ancestors instead.

Cannabis is a gateway drug - this is well know through study. - anyone that thinks everyone will play nice and keep working to pay for thier increasingly serious drug habit that devolves into class A usage o heroine etc is DELUSIONAL - drug related crime will increase exponentially s more people get access to it. - If anyone asked me where to get even basic cannabis my answer would be "not a clue" - you give every bored teenager access to cannabis and you'll lose an entire generation to it - and it's practically that way now - you can smell it on the streets EVERYWHERE, adult teens walk past and the stink is HORRIBLE.

Coutinho is dreadful and an embarrassment to the Conservatives. Literally says and does anything to get a ministerial position. Under Sunak she was a cheerleader for dim whitted net zero policies (easily verifiable by searching for speeches she gave as the minister responsible for net zero), now she pretends she doesn't support those same policies. If a new Tory leader did another 180 on net zero, she would be sitting here cheerleading for it again.

10:14 Please vote this smug ignoramus buffoon into government so reality can correct him, his party and this wicked polarisation which social media has created—a tool Reform UK is very adapt to utilise in marking the out-group. We need a mental and moral reset, because if we won’t listen, then unfortunately we will have to feel and experience the pain of reality bringing everyone back to earth. The more I hear this type of rhetoric the more I’m bracing for impact. Good luck everyone.

Ed Milliband needs to go back to the back benches and NetZero dismantled. The prime example of an economy and commerce destroying policy that is only welcomed by 15% of voters (The affluent middle class ones) and has had a horrible effect on the Working Class that will get disastrously worse as we go on....Meanwhile Indonesia is planning to massively increase it's coal-fired power generation over the next 10 years making Netzero savings look *tiny* and pathetic

I wish commentators would educate themselves more about business. Supermarkets operate on low margins but make a fortune on their cashflow and thus generate large profits. Most bankruptcies happen when they run out of cash to pay employees or suppliers. ( also the taxman.) A supermarket buys £10 million worth of cornflakes on 90 days credit. They sell and bank the cash in say 20 days. They thus hold the money for another 70 days before paying for the cornflakes. Very cash rich. Most businesses are not. Imagine building a jet aeroplane. Millions of £'s invested over a few years before you sell. The margin may be 50% but actual profits may be minimal.

It is not the meager state pensions that need to be cancelled, it is the very generous public sector pensions given to all the public sector bureaucrats and politicians who have so dismally failed us since Thatcher. The amount we have pay for their pensions is trillions. There are a couple of ways of saying it:- I never knew when I paid voluntary NI contributions that I was not paying for my state pension but paying for Blair's and the rest of the public sector creep's pensions. Theft of private sector pensions, state or personal, was started by Gordon Brown when he abolished advance corporation tax relief. Blair's latest proposals are more evidence of the disgusting way the public sector treats us.

The Conservatives lied to the public and people do not forgive. The bigger problem though is that it takes a rare and exceptional person to be a Prime Minister that gets things done and takes hard and unpopular decisions. I am not sure I can see such a person in British politics today. Yes, some of them are better than others, but I don't see a Churchill or a Thatcher amongst the current crop. I don't see any party being truly radical without such a leader.

Gove is totally wrong. Parties of all stripes have ALWAYS punished those people that haven't voted for them. Back in the day, Liebour wouldn't do shit for teachers and the professions because they were all Tories. Now these public sector people are Liebour's core supporters with the government constantly bending over backwards for them. Gove is either being disingenuous of naive if he is arguing otherwise.

Zionism is a political ideology. Labour government will not hold a public inquiry into the influence of pro-Israel groups in British politics, The house of commons Speaker Lindsay Hoyle whos father is a founding member Labour Friends of Israel has personally intervened to block the release of emails he sent to Israeli politicians. Mandelson, Epstien, Mandelson , Blair, Lammy, Priti Patel all had secret meetings with Isreal. It is all connected, thats why they dont want an investigation. Benjamin Netanyahu is a wanted war criminal. All roads lead to Isreal.

The reason the war on drugs has failed is because there is no war. I live in an affluent area of the country and recently a young has moved into the house next of mine. He smokes weed and sells it. He’s been beaten black and blue by a group of local lads and he now smokes the weed away from the houses, I’ve reported him over 20 times to the police and crime stoppers, never seen a single police officer attend the property. Yet if I posted something about immigrants on X my house would be stormed by armed officers. The police are doing nothing about casual weed use round the country. It’s rotting our communities from the inside out.

Here's a theory to consider: Every crime is an income stream for a criminal. And a criminal is a kind of businessman, more than he is a byproduct of there being acts that are crimes. So a criminal is going to do everything possible to maximize profits, since that's the be-all and end-all of good business values. Do a little sum, using those trite facts as inputs. You create the new crime of using and selling narcotics, the unscrupulous businessmen see a little partial monopoly they can exploit, they set up shop, they seek out suppliers and customers, and they work hard to build this business (including by unscrupulous ways, because they're the unscrupulous variety of businessman). So what happens if you remove the crime aspect from the above? Keep it simple. Focus on just the effect of eliminating the crime. I think what happens is that the business case collapses or weakens? Yes, you still have a drugs problem. If you jumped the gun with this at the request to consider just the effect on the drug dealer of maintaining or repealing just the criminal law part of the legislation, please just rewind a tiny bit and consider just this matter. I think it's part of which all the fighting animals in this pit we're creating might agree, and since it's going to be difficult to find civilized common ground in the midst of the general belligerence of the current crop of know-it-alls and their is-isn't-is-isn't debates it's important to establish as much of that as is possible. I posit that (regardless of what you prejudge the best way to deal with the narcotics problem is) that if you use the criminal law approach it creates drug dealers of the kind willing to break any other law. So your drug dealer will be willing to trade some drugs for an addict's little daughter, for instance. It puts the problem in the control of the kind of people who use this to create yet more problems. OK, now I'll just say that there are almost always more than two choices of just about anything. And it seems to me that "both sides" (there are two sides, because that's how we have to vote - like stupid animals in a fighting pit - for one side or the other) are wrong. I propose a third alternative. Nationalize. Sell narcotics in a way that _minimizes_ profits. (This eliminates liberalization as a good way of dealing with the problem). Sell at cost price plus levies to cover side effects. So you'd have a drug abuser education levy to pay for the cost of courses to ensure _informed_ consent on the part of those who choose to harm themselves this way. You'd also have a rehabilitation levy to cover the cost of trying to put Humpty together again. Oh, and for some drugs, you'd have to require contraception - vasectomy for men, IUD for women, maybe. It's irresponsible to give birth to little babies while under the effects of a drug habit. A hard times insurance levy would also be a good idea. This is for the times when a mother is out of money and desperate enough for drugs that she might to something along the lines of "selling" her children. Rather ensure that there are funds out of which you can extend a loan you don't enforce too harshly. I didn't say I have a way to fix the problem. Nobody has. There are just two other popular ways of sweeping the problem under the rug - of being able to go to the voters and say, "See? I _did something_ about this". What you gain to some extent is a capacity to exercise control of the phenomenon - in the little details, examples of which appear above. Some control is what I'd guess is the best you can do, short of just crushing people into submission. And then you might as well just set up a caliphate and go the whole hog. As far as the real world prospects of that goes, I'd point out that at least while Assad was able to run drug labs, the whole Middle East had a big drug problem that probably still exists. And you'll find that there's an alcoholism problem in Pakistan, too. Full success in prohibition is automa

"The master of our fate and the captain of our soul." How utterly ridiculous: All flesh is as grass, and all the glory of man as the flower of the grass. The grass withereth and the flower thereof falleth away: But the word of the Lord endureth forever. William Ernest Henley, the man who wrote Invictus (the poem from which it is quoted) went on to die of tuberculosis following a fall from a train carriage. The idea that he was the master of his fate is deserving of nothing but ridicule.

Katie Lam's reasons why Nigel Farage would be a bad prime minister was that the necessary work will be boring, and Nigel doesn't do boring. That's the best she's got? Also, she said that the Tories made huge errors in government and that's why they should be given another chance - we won't make them again but Reform will. These are VERY weak arguments. The reality is that Reform & the Tories agree, certainly at a strategic level, on just about everything, so which Party you vote for is gut feel rather than policy differences.

We have taught our young people to have no respect. no connection to their own cultural or their own society , so many people perceive , they are being ripped off by the government , by the politicians.. Britain has become one of the most expensive countries to live in... the prices of so many things Keeps going up... making our society less cohesive...so why would they care about stealing from a supermarket..

I work at an International airport and witnessed a small yet shocking amount of immigration courtesy of Johnson. Every day flights would arrive with huge families consisting of a Mother (usually the care worker), a husband, anywhere between 4 to 9(!!!!) children and in some cases elderly parents. Speaking to some of them they had borrowed money to pay someone to arrange a ‘care worker’ Visa from India. The care home they were going to was invariably owned by an Indian owned company, the worker would be allowed 3 months of accommodation and then they were on their own. Most spoke no English. I often wonder where they all went, even now. Thousands upon thousands. Everyone I worked with was stunned. The kids needed school, the elderly parents would need care ironically and certainly health care. Bearing in mind it’s unlikely any of these people will pay any tax the costs must be insane. Absolutely unsustainable. Johnson should be jailed.

Enjoyed listening to this podcast! One thing I’ve been hung up about since July ‘24, is that Labour, having been in opposition for 14 years, had NOTHING PLANNED AT ALL! It was like a very heavy freight train behind a tiny locomotive on an incline! Barely moving at all, and touching its brakes 14 or 15 times(U-turns). That’s a very poor party to vote for at an election!

The class that these people belong to bear the most privilege and thus the most responsibility.journos have been happy to slate criticize and undermine police, teachers and social workers in order to earn a crust while failing repeatedly to properly hold politicians and their inner circles to account. The final straw was Covid and then everyone from Neil Ferguson to Matt Hancock to the PM himself breaking the rules and often the law. Why on earth should anyone behave well when their so called leaders don’t?! The social contract between people and most institutions, whether it is Tesco or your kids school, has really crumbled. People who do wrong get away with it, people who stick to the rules suffer. Who’s the mug?

Interesting question from the Editor: 'what went wrong with ...'. is the reason I will now vote Reform. I have much respect for Ms Lam (she likes poetry!) and I hope she does well but like many others I could no longer consider voting for the Conservative Party - their 14 years in office, post Labour, were a disgrace to the name 'conservative'. Ms Lam's comment suggesting that the CP has learnt from its mistakes is positive but surely impractical with the current batch of MPs who seem to be more LibDem/Green in their views - not, of course, that they will necessarily be re-elected. Great discussion.

Alcohol kills far more people than any other substance illegal or legal and talk about Cannabis coursing health issues then what does tobacco with it 7000+ chemicals VS cannabis with it 3 chemicals; Nitrogen, Phosphorus, and Potassium, that are flushed from the plant that is close if not 100% clean chemically because they don't want chemicals making it into the final cannabis product affecting smell and flavour. If cannabis is so bad for you then tell me how is Tommy Chong at 87 and Cheech Marin at 79 still alive well and high all the time seems to have been so bad for them 💩 and here’s a list of a select few very special individuals who have used cannabis Bob Marley, Snoop Dogg, Willie Nelson, Rihanna, Dr. Dre, Miley Cyrus, The Beatles, Kurt Cobain, Jay-Z, Tyler, The Creator, A$AP Rocky, Kendrick Lamar, Redman, Lady Gaga, Johnny Depp, Barbra Streisand, Brad Pitt, Kristen Stewart, Emma Roberts, Sarah Silverman, Seth Rogen, Cardi B, Kirsten Dunst, Matthew McConaughey, Megan Fox, Ben Affleck, Olivia Wilde, Kate Moss, Russell Brand, Lily Allen, Noel Gallagher, Danny Dyer, Cara Delevingne, David Beckham, Monty Don, Sadiq Khan, Jade Jagger, Richard Branson, John Lennon, Ed Sheeran, Stormzy, Aitch, Zayn Malik, and Samantha Fox so clearly cannabis does not rob you of your senses and makes you lazy and/or overall less productive, Queen Elizabeth the 1st and William Shakespeare definitively the most creative mind of the 16th century and Alexander Dumas known for the Three Musketeers another great writer, also Queen Victoria and her physician said marijuana is one of the most valuable medicines they possess, Hua Tuo created the first anaesthetic using wine and weed and Francis Crick was one of the most historic scientists of his time, some of the most famous historical figures used cannabis and they literally changed the entire world. Including its positive effects on the global economy, here’s the show of many benefits cannabis plant to start; 1. Pain Relief. 2. Anti-inflammatory Effects. 3. Reduction of Anxiety and Stress. 4. Improved Sleep. 5. Neuroprotective Properties and 6. Appetite Stimulation. 7. Anti-Nausea and Vomiting and 8. Muscle Relaxation. 9. Epilepsy and Seizure Control. 10. Mood Stabilization and Anti Depressive effects. 11. Cancer Treatment Support. 12. Glaucoma Treatment. 13. Skin Health. 14. Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) symptom management. 15. Addiction Treatment and Heart Health. 17. Antioxidant and Antibacterial Properties. 18. Multiple Sclerosis (MS) Relief. 19. Migraines and Headaches. 20. Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) 21. Anti-tumour properties. 22. Diabetes Management. 23. Crohn’s Disease and Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) Relief. 24. Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS) 25. Hair Follicular Regeneration. 26. Menstrual Pain Relief. 27. Anti-psychotic effects. 28. Bone Health and Healing. 29. Reduction of Chronic Inflammation. 30. Improved Mental Focus. And finally 31. Mood Enhancement. The main component of cannabis often blamed for mental health problems is THC; yet cannabis also contains cannabidiol (CBD) and other compounds which has neuroprotective properties; it’s worth noting that we all have an endocannabinoid system designed to receive cannabinoids, this plant interacts with our bodies, and few realize that the human body produces chemicals similar to THC known as endocannabinoids, found across all vertebrate species even if you’ve never used cannabis, if it triggers underlying mental health issues due to our natural internal body production these cannabis-like chemicals and molecules everyone across the entire globe 100% of people would experience mental health problems and we don’t, cannabis does not influence the person that you are; if you are still in control of your body you do not lose control of your actions and this is just reiterated hysteria on repeat.

8:06 Trevor half nails it here. Sure, small communities help ringfence public shame, meaning everyone knows everyone else's transgressions, and so you can never escape the glare of public opprobrium. But we had a shared, common set of morals in our cities and large towns before this new age of selfishness and tribalism, which kept most everyone in check. 70 years ago, people lived side by side with strangers in their hundreds of thousands, and in capitals like London, in their millions, with astonishingly low levels of petty and serious crime, by today's standards. So what has changed? Two things... academia and unrestricted immigration. Academia has infected society with layer upon layer of iconoclastic, tradition-wrecking, experimental ideas, leaving all western societies godless and unmoored from our traditions and our histories. And immigration has invited in a world of people who think tribally and clannishly - people for whom morality means nothing more than clan loyalty. These are the true twin reasons for the collapse in standards throughout the west. In both cases, I blame the progressives. Why not? They gave us Nazism and eugenics, so they clearly have an atrocious track record. We should stop listening to (non-STEM) 'experts', and go back to learning from wise ancestors instead.

Cannabis is a gateway drug - this is well know through study. - anyone that thinks everyone will play nice and keep working to pay for thier increasingly serious drug habit that devolves into class A usage o heroine etc is DELUSIONAL - drug related crime will increase exponentially s more people get access to it. - If anyone asked me where to get even basic cannabis my answer would be "not a clue" - you give every bored teenager access to cannabis and you'll lose an entire generation to it - and it's practically that way now - you can smell it on the streets EVERYWHERE, adult teens walk past and the stink is HORRIBLE.

Coutinho is dreadful and an embarrassment to the Conservatives. Literally says and does anything to get a ministerial position. Under Sunak she was a cheerleader for dim whitted net zero policies (easily verifiable by searching for speeches she gave as the minister responsible for net zero), now she pretends she doesn't support those same policies. If a new Tory leader did another 180 on net zero, she would be sitting here cheerleading for it again.

10:14 Please vote this smug ignoramus buffoon into government so reality can correct him, his party and this wicked polarisation which social media has created—a tool Reform UK is very adapt to utilise in marking the out-group. We need a mental and moral reset, because if we won’t listen, then unfortunately we will have to feel and experience the pain of reality bringing everyone back to earth. The more I hear this type of rhetoric the more I’m bracing for impact. Good luck everyone.

Ed Milliband needs to go back to the back benches and NetZero dismantled. The prime example of an economy and commerce destroying policy that is only welcomed by 15% of voters (The affluent middle class ones) and has had a horrible effect on the Working Class that will get disastrously worse as we go on....Meanwhile Indonesia is planning to massively increase it's coal-fired power generation over the next 10 years making Netzero savings look *tiny* and pathetic

I wish commentators would educate themselves more about business. Supermarkets operate on low margins but make a fortune on their cashflow and thus generate large profits. Most bankruptcies happen when they run out of cash to pay employees or suppliers. ( also the taxman.) A supermarket buys £10 million worth of cornflakes on 90 days credit. They sell and bank the cash in say 20 days. They thus hold the money for another 70 days before paying for the cornflakes. Very cash rich. Most businesses are not. Imagine building a jet aeroplane. Millions of £'s invested over a few years before you sell. The margin may be 50% but actual profits may be minimal.

It is not the meager state pensions that need to be cancelled, it is the very generous public sector pensions given to all the public sector bureaucrats and politicians who have so dismally failed us since Thatcher. The amount we have pay for their pensions is trillions. There are a couple of ways of saying it:- I never knew when I paid voluntary NI contributions that I was not paying for my state pension but paying for Blair's and the rest of the public sector creep's pensions. Theft of private sector pensions, state or personal, was started by Gordon Brown when he abolished advance corporation tax relief. Blair's latest proposals are more evidence of the disgusting way the public sector treats us.

The Conservatives lied to the public and people do not forgive. The bigger problem though is that it takes a rare and exceptional person to be a Prime Minister that gets things done and takes hard and unpopular decisions. I am not sure I can see such a person in British politics today. Yes, some of them are better than others, but I don't see a Churchill or a Thatcher amongst the current crop. I don't see any party being truly radical without such a leader.